dabl® Educational Trust banner
Home
About Us
Validation
Devices
Manufacturers
Library
Directory
Disclaimer
Sitemap

 

Founding Sponsor

Click here to go to the dabl Disease Management Systems website
dabl Ltd providers 24 hour ABPM interpretation software that links to a range of validated devices.

Classification of sphygmomanometers/blood pressure measuring devices A table of blood pressure measurement devices as recommended by the dabl Educational Trust Advisory Board Table of devices currently available on the market Table of devices that have been discontinued by their manufacturers
Table of currently available blood pressure monitors Current page: devices used in a clinical setting Table of devices used for self/home blood pressure measurement Table of devices used for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement

Sphygmomanometers for Clinical Use

| MANUAL DEVICES | AUTOMATED DEVICES | FINGER DEVICES |

The following tables are lists of currently available Mercury, Aneroid and Non-Mercury Manual Sphygmomanometers, Automated Devices for Clinical Use and Finger Devices for Clinial Measurement. Discontinued devices are shown on a separate table. A complete list of all devices is available on our Device Index.

Manual Devices

New to the marketNew to the website  
Device Mode AAMI BHS ESH 2002 ESH 2010 Circumstance Recommendation Ref  
A&D UM-101       Pass   Without use of "Mark" button Recommended 7  
    Fail   With use of "Mark" button Not Recommended 7  
Accoson Greenlight 300 Electronic Display     Pass   At rest Recommended 1  
Heine Gamma G7 Aneroid     Pass   At rest Recommended 6  
Heine Gamma XXL-LF Aneroid     Pass   At rest Recommended 6  
Microlife BP 3AS1-2 Electronic     Pass   At rest Recommended 10  
Microlife WatchBP Office Electronic     Pass   At rest Recommended 8  
Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB Electronic     Pass   WatchBP Office Equivalence Recommended E29  
Nissei DM-3000 Electronic Display     Pass   2.5 mmHg/s deflation rate Recommended 12  
    Pass   "Blinded mode" with use of "Mark" button Recommended 12
Pic Solution (Artsana)
Pic Indolor (Artsana)
Professional Check
Electronic + Osc Help     Pass   At rest Recommended 11  
PMS Mandaus   Pass A/A     Abstract; Protocol violation Questionable 2  
    Pass   Minor adjustments Recommended 5  
PyMaH Mercury Hg Pass A/A NA   At rest Recommended 3  
Rossmax Mandaus II LCD Display     Pass   At rest Recommended 9  
Welch-Allyn Maxi Stabil 3 Aneroid Pass A/A     Small recruitment violation Recommended 4  

References for Validation of Manual Devices

1 Graves JW, Tibor M, Murtagh B, Klein L, Sheps SG. The Accoson Greenlight 300 - the first non-automated mercury-free blood pressure measurement device to pass the International Protocol for blood pressure measuring devices in adults Blood Press Monit 2004;9:13-17
2 Shabeeh H, Cuckson AC, Jones C, Randhawa M, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory blood pressure measuring device: the PMS Mandaus.[dabl® Educational Trust regrets that full details are missing]S.233 (Abstract)
3 O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Inaccuracy of seven popular sphygmomanometers for home-measurement of blood pressure. J Hypertens 1990;8:621-634.
4 Reinders A, Jones C, Cuckson A, Shennan A, The Maxi Stabil 3: Validation of an aneroid device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2003;8:83-89
5 Wilton A, Shabeeh H, Cuckson C, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device with manual pressure registration (PMS Mandaus) Blood Press Monit 2006;11:161-164
6 Dorigatti F, Bonso E, Zanier A, Palatini P. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:29-33
7 Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Gkinos CP, Tzamouranis DG. Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2008;13:37-42
8 Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, Nasothimiou E, Kapralos C. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol Blood Press Monit 2008;13:299-303
9 Tasker F, de Greeff A, Liu B, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II Blood Press Monit 2009;14:121-124
10 de Greeff A, Nathan H, Stafford N, Liu B, Shennan AH. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. Blood Press Monit 2008;13:342-348
11 Asmar R, Khabouth J, Mattar J, Pecchioli V, Germano G. Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional. J Hypertens 2010;28(3):452-458
12 Tasker F, De Greeff A, Shennan AH. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24:609-616

Automated Devices for Clinical Use

For a complete list of devices see our Device Index and for discontinued devices see our Discontinued Devices Index.

New to the marketNew to the website FTS: Study evaluated prior to publication using the dabl®Educational Fast Track validation Service
Device Mode AAMI BHS ESH 2002 ESH 2010 Circumstance Recommendation Ref  
A&D TM-2564G Osc Pass A/A     Serious protocol violations Questionable 18  
A&D TM-2656 Osc Pass A/A     At rest Recommended 56  
Andon KD-5917 Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 66
BpTRU
BPM-100
BPM-300
Osc Pass A/A     At rest. Pressure ranges Recommended 5, 6  
Pass       Children Questionable 12  
Pass A/A     Mixed adult/paediatric population
Protocol Violations
Should have used 1990 instead of 1993 BHS criteria but still A/A
Questionable 13  
BpTRU
(unspecified)
          Pass Ad Hoc Protocol;
Abstract
Questionable 14  
Colin 8800C Osc Pass       AAMI only Questionable 23  
CVProfilor DO-2020 Dynamic linear deflation, Osc & Acoustic         New methodology, Passed Ad-hoc protocol Questionable 9  
Datascope Accutorr Plus Osc Pass A/A     At rest Recommended 1  
Pass       Trimline cuff replacement, at rest, protocol variation Questionable 17  
    Pass   Children. Adaptation of protocol along BHS guidelines. Recommended 22  
DiaTecne
PulsePen
Tonometry         Abstract;
Pass ad hoc protocol;
Developer assessment
Questionable 16  
Dinamap ProCare Osc     Pass   At rest Recommended 21  
Osc Pass A/A     At rest Recommended 24  
Dinamap ProCare-120 Osc     Fail   Children. Adaptation of protocol along BHS guidelines. Not Recommended 22  
Dixtal DX-2020 Osc       Fail At rest Not Recommended 57  
Foracare Fora P30 Plus Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 52  
G-Care Electronics
SP-800
Osc     Pass   Abstract Only Questionable 29  
Hartmann Tensoval Duo Control Aus-Osc Pass A/A Pass   At rest Recommended 30  
Hartmann Tensoval Duo Control II Aus-Osc Pass A/A   Pass* *ESH-IP 2010 in Aus mode only Recommended 55  
HoMedics BPA-300 Aus & Osc Pass       Sample size well over 85. Low mean BP Questionable 25  
iHealth BP3 (KD-931) Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 44  
    Pass   KD-5915 Equivalence Recommended E60  
Lohmeier B-606 Osc     Pass   Abstract Questionable 4  
Microlife BP 3AS1-2 Osc     Pass   At rest Recommended 34  
Microlife WatchBP Home (BP3MX1-1) Osc     Pass   At rest Recommended 61  
  A/A     Pregnancy Recommended 62  
  B/A     Pre-Eclampsia Recommended 62  
Microlife WatchBP Home A (BP3MX1-3) Osc     Pass   Watch BP Home Equivalence Recommended E27  
Microlife WatchBP Home N (BP3MX1-4) Osc     Pass   Watch BP Home Equivalence Recommended E70  
Microlife WatchBP Home S (BP3MX1-5) Osc     Pass   Watch BP Home Equivalence Recommended E28  
Microlife WatchBP O3 (3MZ0) Osc     Pass   At rest Recommended 38  
Microlife WatchBP O3 (3MZ1) Osc     Pass   At rest Recommended 39  
Microlife WatchBP Office Osc     Pass   At rest Recommended 33  
Microlife WatchBP Office ABI Osc Pass A/A Pass   At rest Recommended 42 FTS  
    Pass   L-XL size cuff Recommended 45  
Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB Electronic     Pass   WatchBP Office Equivalence Recommended E29  
Microlife WatchBP Office Target Electronic     Pass   BP A100 Equivalence Recommended E37  
Nissei DM-3000 Osc     Pass   Automatic Mode Recommended 37  
Nissei DSK-1011 Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 48  
Nissei DSK-1031 Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 49  
Nissei DSK-1051 Osc       Pass DSK-1031 Equivalence Recommended E98  
Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) Osc     Pass     Recommended 20  
Osc Pass A/A     Minor recruitment modification Recommended 19  
Osc     Pass   Children and adolescents. Reasonable adaptation of protocol. Recommended 3  
Omron 725 CIC (HEM-725CIC) Osc         Ad Hoc Protocol. None 26  
Omron 907 (HEM-907-E) Aus & Osc     Pass   Data analysed according to IP proposal only, Osc mode only Questionable 10  
Pass       At rest, Osc mode only, AAMI only, Recruitment violation Questionable 11  
    Pass   Elderly Population. Mode not stated. Recommended 27  
    Fail   In ESRD before and after haemodialysis, Osc mode only Not Recommended 36  
Omron HBP-1100 Osc       Pass HBP-1300 Equivalence Recommended E116
Omron HBP-1300 Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 65
Omron HBP-T105 Osc     Pass   High speed mode with smart inflation Recommended 31  
Omron HEM-7130 (Japanese model) Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 58  
Omron HEM-7250-IT Osc       Pass HEM-7251G Equivalence Recommended E102  
Omron HEM-7251G Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 53  
Omron HEM-7320F Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 59  
Omron HEM-7500F Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 60  
Omron i-Q142
(HEM-1040-E)
Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 51  
Omron M2
(HEM-7121-E)
Osc       Pass HEM-7130 (Japanese model) Equivalence Recommended E112  
Omron M2 Basic
(HEM-7120-E)
Osc       Pass HEM-7130 (Japanese model) Equivalence Recommended E111  
Omron M3
(HEM-7131-E)
Osc       Pass M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) Equivalence Recommended E113  
Omron M3 IT
(HEM-7131U-E)
Osc       Pass M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) Equivalence Recommended E114  
Omron M3W
(HEM-7202-E)
Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 50  
Omron M4-I
(HEM-752-E)
Osc Pass A/A Pass   705IT (HEM-759-E) Equivalence Recommended E15  
Omron M6 AC
(HEM-7322-E)
Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 64  
Omron M6 Comfort
(HEM-7321-E)
Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 63  
Omron M6 Comfort IT
(HEM-7322U-E)
Osc       Pass M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E115  
Omron MIT Elite
(HEM-7300-WE)
Osc   A/A     Pregnancy Recommended 43  
  A/A     Pre-Eclampsia Recommended 43  
Omron (Colin) Pressmate BP10 Osc     Pass   At rest Recommended 31  
Primo RACD Radial artery compression (Pass)       RAL catheter in ICU. Limited sample. Device "shows promise" (Authors). Questionable 32  
Spengler Tensionic Mod EPS 112 Osc Pass B/A     At rest; Abstract Questionable 2  
SunTech Medical SunTech 247 Osc Pass; A/A Pass   At rest Recommended 35  
Terumo ES-H55 Osc
Double-cuff
Pass       Manufacturer Assessment Questionable 15  
Thermor Bios BD215 Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 54  
UEBE Visomat Comfort E (Ref 24016) Osc       Pass Double Comfort (Osc Mode) Equivalence Recommended E104  
UEBE Visomat Double Comfort Osc       Pass At rest Recommended 4147  
Aus       Pass At rest Recommended 4046
Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs Osc Pass       Only Method 1 completed. Ages 5-77 Questionable 28  
Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' Osc Pass A/A     At rest. Pressure ranges Recommended 7  
Fail C/D     At rest. Not Recommended 8  
    Fail   Children. Adaptation of protocol along BHS guidelines. Not Recommended 22  

References for Validation of Automated Devices for Clinical Use

1 Anwar YA, Tendler BE, McCabe EJ, Mansoor GA, White WB. Evaluation of the Datascope Accutorr Plus according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation Blood Press Monit 1997;2(2):105-10
2 Bobrie G, Battaglia C. Assessment of Tensionic Mod EPS 112 semi-automatic device of blood pressure measurement (Manufactured by Spengler - France) J Hypertens 1999:17 (suppl 3):S22-S23. Abstract
3 Stergiou GS, Yiannes NG, Rarra VC. Validation of the Omron 705IT oscillometric device for home blood pressure measurement in children and adolescents: The Arsakion School Study Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006,11:229-234
4 Pujol E, Jimenez L, Estrada D, de la Sierra A. Accuracy of the automated oscillometric device Lohmeier B-606 for measurement of blood pressure in hospitals AJH 2002;15:74 A (Abstract)
5 Mattu GS, Perry TL, Wright JM. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100Beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer Blood Press Monit 2001;6:153-159
6 Wright JM, Mattu GS, Perry TL, Gelfer M, Strange KD, Zorn A, Chen Y. Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitor Blood Press Monit 2001;6:161-165
7 Jones CR, Taylor K, Poston L, Shennan AH. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' oscillometric blood pressure monitor J Hum Hypertens 2001;15:191-195
8 Braam RL, de Maat CHA, Thien TH. Accuracy of the Welch Allyn Vital Signs Monitor 52000 Blood Pressure Measuring Device J Hypertens 2001;19 (suppl 2):S24 (Abstract)
9 Prisant LM, Resnick LM, Hollenberg SM. Assessment of sequential same arm agreement of blood pressure measurements by a CVProfilor DO-2020TM versus a Baumanometer® mercury sphygmomanometer Blood Press Monit 2001;6:149-152
10 El Assaad MA, Topouchian JA, Darne BM, Asmar RG. Validation of the Omron HEM-907 device for blood pressure measurement Blood Press Monit 2002;7:237-241
11 White WB, Anwar YA. Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults Blood Press Monit 2001;6:107-110
12 Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Comparison of the automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTru) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population Blood Press Monit 2004;9:39-45
13 Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Overall accuracy of the BpTru - an automated electronic blood pressure device Blood Press Monit 2004;9:47-52
14 Graves JW, Nash C, Baily KR, Sheps SG. Utility of an automated blood pressure (BP) measuring device (BPTru) in clinical decision making. American Journal of Hypertension 2003;16(No 5, Part 2):49A (Abstract P-29)
15 Tochikubo O, Nishijima K, Ohshige K, Kimura K. Accuracy and applicability of the Terumo ES-H55 double-cuff sphygmomanometer for hospital use Blood Press Monit 2003;8:203-209
16 Salvi P, Lio G, Ricci E, Labat C, Benetos A. Validation of a new hand-held transcutaneous arterial tonometer for a non-invasive evaluation of blood pressure values, pulse wave morphology and central hemodynamic parameters J Hypertens 2004;22 (suppl 1):S130 (Abstract P465)
17 White W, Herbst T, Thavarajah S, Giacco S. Clinical evaluation of the Trimline blood pressure cuffs with the Accutorr Plus Monitor Blood Press Monit 2003;8:137-140
18 Kobalava ZD , Kotovskaya YV , Rodionov EV, Moiseev VS. Validation of the TM-2564G device for in-hospital blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure Monitoring 2005;10:333-335
19 Coleman A, Freeman P, Steel S, Shennan A. Validation of the Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006;11:27-32
20 El Assad M, Topouchian J, Asmar R. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT Blood Press Monit 2003;8(3):127-133
21 Reinders A, Reggiori F , Shennan AH. Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population Blood Press Monit 2006;11:293-296
22 Wong SN, Sung RYT, Leung LCK. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006;11:281-291
23 Pergola PE, White CL, Graves JW, Coffey CS, Tonarelli SB, Hart RG, Benavente OR for the SPS3 investigators. Reliability and validity of blood pressure measurement in the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:1-8
24 de Greeff A, Reggiori F, Shennan AH. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:51-55
25 Yarows SA. Accuracy of the HoMedics BPA-300, a home blood pressure monitor using the auscultatory method Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:339-343
26 Fonseca-Reyes S, Cervantes-Munguia R, de Alba-Garcia JG, Parra-Carrillo JZ, Lopez-Maldonado F, Montes-Casillas M. Evaluation and effects of the Omron 725 CIC device for measuring blood pressure in a hypertension clinic Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:321-327
27 Omboni S, Riva I, Giglio I, Caldara G, Groppelli A, Parati G. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:233-242
28 Alpert BS. Validation of the Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs blood pressure device according to the ANSI/AAMI SP10: 2002. Accuracy and cost-efficiency successfully combined Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:345-347
29 Topouchian J, El Feghali R, El Assaad H, Pannier B, Asmar R. Validation of the G-Care Electronics SP-8000 (op. cit. SP-800 ) Device for Blood Pressure Measurement According to the International Validation Protocol Journal of Hypertension 2006;25(suppl 2):S172 (Abstract)
30 de Greeff A, Arora J, Hervey S, Liu B, Shennan AH. Accuracy assessment of the Tensoval duo control according to the British and European Hypertension Societies' standards Blood Pressure Monitoring 2008;13:111-116
31 Asmar R, Khabouth J, Mattar J, Pecchioli V, Germano G. Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional. J Hypertens 2010;28(3):452-458
32 Fix ML, Goldstein JN, Listwa TM, Nelson SW, Thomas SH. Comparison of a radial artery compression device with invasive radial artery blood pressure monitoring Blood Press Monit 2008;13:199-203
33 Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, Nasothimiou E, Kapralos C. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol Blood Press Monit 2008;13:299-303
34 de Greeff A, Nathan H, Stafford N, Liu B, Shennan AH. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. Blood Press Monit 2008;13:342-348
35 Friz HP, Facchetti R, Primitz L, Beltrame L, Galbiati V, Ricioppo A, Bombelli M, Sega R. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards. Blood Press Monit 2009;14:222-227
36 Czarkowski M, Staszków M, Kostyra K, Shebani Z, Niemczyk S, Matuszkiewicz-Rowi?ska J. Determining the accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Omron HEM-907 before and after hemodialysis. Blood Press Monit 2009;14:232-238
37 Tasker F, De Greeff A, Shennan AH. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24:609-616
38 Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Nasothimiou EG, Karpettas N, Protogerou A. Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24(3):207-12.
39 Ragazzo F, Saladini F, Palatini P. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP O3 device for clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement, according to the International Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2010;15(1):59-62.
40 Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in auscultation mode, for clinic use and self-measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(4):208-210.
41 Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinic use and self-measurement in a general population according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol, revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(5):262-264
42 Saladini F, Benetti E, Masiero S, Palatini P. Accuracy of Microlife WatchBP Office ABI monitor assessed according to the 2002 European Society of Hypertension protocol and the British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(5):258-261
43 Chung Y, Brochut MC, de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Clinical accuracy of inflationary oscillometry in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: Omron-MIT Elite. Preg Hyper: An Int J Women's Card Health 2012 (In press) doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2012.04.001
44 Chen C, Shang F, Wang J, Chen J, Ji N, Wan Y. Validation of the iHealth BP3 upper-arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2012;17(6):253-256. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32835b9ecb
45 Masiero S, Saladini F, Benetti E, Palatini P. Accuracy of the Microlife large-extra large-sized cuff (32-52 cm) coupled to an automatic oscillometric device. Blood Press Monit. 2011;16(2):99-102. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328344c73c
46 Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in auscultation mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Apr 27. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2011/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of UEBE Visomat_Double_Comfort (Auscultatory Mode).pdf.
47 Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Apr 27. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2011/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of UEBE Visomat_Double_Comfort (Oscillometric Mode).pdf.
48 de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Nissei DSK-1011 upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Sep 01. 9 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2011/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Nissei DSK-1011.pdf.
49 de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Nissei DSK-1031 upper arm oscillometric blood pressure monitor intended for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Oct 28. 3 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2011/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Nissei DSK-1031.pdf.
50 Takahashi H. Validation of the Omron M3W upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Mar 01. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2012/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron M3W (HEM-7202-E).pdf
51 Takahashi H. Validation of the Omron i-Q142(HEM-1040-E), an upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Jun 07. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2012/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron i-Q142 (HEM-1040-E).pdf
52 Ding D. Validation of the FORA P30 Plus Upper Arm Blood Pressure Monitor, for Clinic Use and Self/Home Measurement, According to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Oct 19. 6 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2012/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Foracare Fora P30 Plus.pdf
53 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7251G upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Feb 01. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2013/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7251G.pdf
54 Palatini P. Validation of the Thermor Bios BP215 upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Oct 09. 11 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2013/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Thermor Bios BD215.pdf
55 de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Tensoval Duo Control II blood pressure monitor for clinic use and self-measurement according to the British Hypertension Society protocol and the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(3):161-6. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328360fb52
56 Zeng WF, Liu M, Kang YY, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the fully automated A&D TM-2656 blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(4):223-6. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283624abd
57 Gothardo AC, Savioli AF, Santos DS, Lamas JL. Lack of validation of the Dixtal (DX 2020) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinical use in an intensive care unit, according to the European Society of Hypertension-International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(4):215-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283624ad7
58 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7130 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2013/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7130.pdf
59 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7320F upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2013/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7500F.pdf
60 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7500F upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2013/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7500F.pdf
61 Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Charilaos P. Gkinos CP, Patouras JD. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol Blood Press Monit 2007;12:185-188
62 Chung Y, de Greeff A, Shennan A. Validation and Compliance of a Home Monitoring Device in Pregnancy: Microlife WatchBP Home. Hypertens Pregnancy 2009;28(3):348-59.
63 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 Jan 22. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2014/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E).pdf
64 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 Jan 22. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2014/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E).pdf
65 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HBP-1300 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 May 22. 4 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2014/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HBP-1300.pdf
66 Guo WG1, Li BL, He Y, Xue YS, Wang HY, Zheng QS, Xiang DC. Validation of the Andon KD-5917 automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. Blood Press Monit 2014;19(4):242-5. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000048

Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement of Blood Pressure

For a complete list of devices see our Device Index and for discontinued devices see our Discontinued Devices Index.

New to the market New to the website  
Device Mode AAMI BHS ESH 2002 ESH 2010 Circumstance Recommendation Ref  
TNO BIO
Finometer
Finger Fail C/D     Pregnancy;
Semi-supine;
Protocol adjustments
Not Recommended 1  
Fail C/B     Normotensive Subgroup
Fail D/D     Pre-eclampsia Subgroup
Fail D/D     Hypertensive Subgroup
Pass A/B     Abstract; Black Women; Protocol violations; Incorrect sample size Questionable 2  

References for Validation of Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement of Blood Pressure

1 Elvan-Taspinar A, UiterKamp LAMS, Sikkema JM, Bots ML, Koomans HA, Bruinse HW, Franx A. Validation and use of the Finometer for blood pressure measurement in normal, hypertensive and pre-eclamptic pregnancy J Hypertension 2003;21:S2053-2060
2 Schutte AE, Huisman HW, van Rooyen JM, Malan NT, Schutte R. Validation of the Finometer device for measurement of blood pressure in black women. J Human Hypertens 2004;18(2):79-84 Abstract

 

© Copyright dabl®Educational Trust Ltd. 2014. All rights reserved. Please read the Disclaimer before using this website.

<< Back<<   Sitemap    >>Next Page >>