dabl® Educational Trust banner
Home
About Us
Validation
Devices
Manufacturers
Library
Directory
Disclaimer
Sitemap

 

Founding Sponsor

Click here to go to the dabl clinical trials systems website

The most advanced online system for Clinical Trials.
Links to a range of validated monitors for immediate validation of uploaded and entered data.

More details and explanations are provided in a video.


Classification of sphygmomanometers/blood pressure measuring devices A table of blood pressure measurement devices as recommended by the dabl Educational Trust Advisory Board Table of devices currently available on the market Table of devices that have been discontinued by their manufacturers
Table of currently available blood pressure monitors Current page: devices used in a clinical setting Table of devices used for self/home blood pressure measurement Table of devices used for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement

Sphygmomanometers for Clinical Use

| MANUAL DEVICES | AUTOMATED DEVICES | FINGER DEVICES |

The following tables are lists of currently available Mercury, Aneroid and Non-Mercury Manual Sphygmomanometers, Automated Devices for Clinical Use and Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement. Discontinued devices are shown on a separate table. A complete list of all devices is available on our Device Index.

Manual Devices

   
Device Mode AAMI BHS ESH 2002 ESH 2010 ISO 81060-2:2013 ISO 81060-2:2018 Circumstance Recommendation Ref
A&D UM-101       Pass       Without use of "Mark" button Recommended 7
    Fail       With use of "Mark" button Not Recommended 7
A&D UM-102       Pass       A&D UM-101 Equivalence, Without use of "Mark" button Recommended E137
Accoson Greenlight 300 Electronic Display     Pass       At rest Recommended 1
Heine Gamma G7 Aneroid     Pass       At rest Recommended 6
Heine Gamma XXL-LF Aneroid     Pass       At rest Recommended 6
Microlife BP 3AS1-2 Electronic     Pass       At rest Recommended 10
Microlife WatchBP Office Electronic     Pass       At rest Recommended 8
Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB Electronic     Pass       WatchBP Office Equivalence Recommended E29
Nissei DM-3000 Electronic Display     Pass       2.5 mmHg/s deflation rate Recommended 12
    Pass       "Blinded mode" with use of "Mark" button Recommended 12
Pic Solution (Artsana)
Pic Indolor (Artsana)
Professional Check
Electronic + Osc Help     Pass       At rest Recommended 11
Plusmed pM-NT 01 Electronic     Pass       Microlife BP3AS1-2 Equivalence Recommended E125
PMS Mandaus   Pass A/A         Abstract; Protocol violation Questionable 2
    Pass       Minor adjustments Recommended 5
PyMaH Mercury Hg Pass A/A NA       At rest Recommended 3
Rossmax Mandaus II LCD Display     Pass       At rest Recommended 9
Welch-Allyn Maxi Stabil 3 Aneroid Pass A/A         Small recruitment violation Recommended 4

References for Validation of Manual Devices

1 Graves JW, Tibor M, Murtagh B, Klein L, Sheps SG. The Accoson Greenlight 300 - the first non-automated mercury-free blood pressure measurement device to pass the International Protocol for blood pressure measuring devices in adults Blood Press Monit 2004;9:13-17
2 Shabeeh H, Cuckson AC, Jones C, Randhawa M, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory blood pressure measuring device: the PMS Mandaus.[dabl® Educational Trust regrets that full details are missing]S.233 (Abstract)
3 O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Inaccuracy of seven popular sphygmomanometers for home-measurement of blood pressure. J Hypertens 1990;8:621-634.
4 Reinders A, Jones C, Cuckson A, Shennan A, The Maxi Stabil 3: Validation of an aneroid device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2003;8:83-89
5 Wilton A, Shabeeh H, Cuckson C, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device with manual pressure registration (PMS Mandaus) Blood Press Monit 2006;11:161-164
6 Dorigatti F, Bonso E, Zanier A, Palatini P. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:29-33
7 Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Gkinos CP, Tzamouranis DG. Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2008;13:37-42
8 Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, Nasothimiou E, Kapralos C. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol Blood Press Monit 2008;13:299-303
9 Tasker F, de Greeff A, Liu B, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II Blood Press Monit 2009;14:121-124
10 de Greeff A, Nathan H, Stafford N, Liu B, Shennan AH. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. Blood Press Monit 2008;13:342-348
11 Asmar R, Khabouth J, Mattar J, Pecchioli V, Germano G. Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional. J Hypertens 2010;28(3):452-458
12 Tasker F, De Greeff A, Shennan AH. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24:609-616

Automated Devices for Clinical Use

For a complete list of devices see our Device Index and for discontinued devices see our Discontinued Devices Index.

  FTS: Study evaluated prior to publication using the dabl®Educational Fast Track validation Service
tr>
Device Mode AAMI BHS ESH 2002 ESH 2010 ISO 81060-2:2013 ISO 81060-2:2018 Circumstance Recommendation Ref
A&D TM-2564G Osc Pass A/A         Serious protocol violations Questionable 18
A&D TM-2655 Osc Pass A/A         Methods poorly explained Questionable 70
A&D TM-2656 Osc Pass A/A         At rest Recommended 56
A&D TM-2657 Osc Pass A/A         A&D TM-2656 Equivalence Recommended E136
A&D UM-201 Osc       Pass     At rest
Cuff sizes of 16-24, 22-32, and 31-45 cm.
Recommended 80
A&D UM-211 Osc       Pass     At rest
Cuff sizes of 16-24, 22-32 and 31-45cm.
Recommended 81
Andon KD-595 Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 73
Andon KD-5031 Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 72
Andon KD-5917 Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 66
Beurer BM45 Osc       Pass     Grandway G.Lab MD2680 Equivalence Recommended E228
Beurer BM85 Osc       Pass     iHealth BP3 Equivalence Recommended E126
BpTRU
BPM-100
BPM-300
Osc Pass A/A         At rest. Pressure ranges Recommended 5, 6
Pass           Children Questionable 12
Pass A/A         Mixed adult/paediatric population
Protocol Violations
Should have used 1990 instead of 1993 BHS criteria but still A/A
Questionable 13
BpTRU
(unspecified)
              Pass Ad Hoc Protocol;
Abstract
Questionable 14
CA-MI Srl CHIESI 0100000328 (DIESIS PLUS) Osc       Pass     Nissei DSK-1011 Equivalence Recommended E139
CA-MI Srl CHIESI 0100000329 (DIESIS) Osc       Pass     Nissei DSK-1011 Equivalence Recommended E138
Citizen CHU305 Osc       Pass     Andon KD-5917 Equivalence Recommended E124
Citizen CHUD514 Osc       Pass     Andon KD-595 Equivalence Recommended E179
Citizen CHUD517 Osc       Pass     Andon KD-5917 Equivalence Recommended E180
Colin 8800C Osc Pass           AAMI only Questionable 23
CVProfilor DO-2020 Dynamic linear deflation, Osc & Acoustic             New methodology, Passed Ad-hoc protocol Questionable 9
Datascope Accutorr Plus Osc Pass A/A         At rest Recommended 1
Pass           Trimline cuff replacement, at rest, protocol variation Questionable 17
    Pass       Children. Adaptation of protocol along BHS guidelines. Recommended 22
DiaTecne
PulsePen
Tonometry             Abstract;
Pass ad hoc protocol;
Developer assessment
Questionable 16
Dinamap ProCare Osc     Pass       At rest Recommended 21
Osc Pass A/A         At rest Recommended 24
Dinamap ProCare-120 Osc     Fail       Children. Adaptation of protocol along BHS guidelines. Not Recommended 22
Dixtal DX-2020 Osc       Fail     At rest Not Recommended 57
Erkameter 125 PRO Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 71
Foracare Fora P30 Plus Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 52
G-Care Electronics
SP-800
Osc     Pass       Abstract Only Questionable 29
HARTMANN Tensoval Duo Control Aus-Osc Pass A/A Pass       At rest Recommended 30
HARTMANN Tensoval Duo Control II Aus-Osc Pass A/A   Pass*     *ESH-IP 2010 in Aus mode only Recommended 55
HARTMANN Veroval Duo Control Aus-Osc Pass A/A   Pass*     *ESH-IP 2010 in Aus mode only
HARTMANN Tensoval Duo Control II Equivalence
Recommended E181
Health and Life
(Health & Life)
HL-868ED
Osc   A/A         At rest Recommended 82
      Pass     At rest Recommended 83
Hingmed DBP-01P Electronic Display           Pass At rest Recommended 87
HoMedics BPA-300 Aus & Osc Pass           Sample size well over 85. Low mean BP Questionable 25
iHealth BP3 (KD-931) Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 44
    Pass       KD-5915 Equivalence Recommended E60
InBody BP170 Osc         Pass   At rest
ISO 81060-2:2018
Recommended 85
InBody BP170B Osc         Pass   InBody BP170 Equivalence Recommended E209
InBody BPBIO250 Osc         Pass   At rest
ISO 81060-2:2018
Recommended 84
InBody BPBIO320 Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 77
InBody BPBIO320N Osc       Pass     InBody BPBIO320 Equivalence Recommended E190
InBody BPBIO320S Osc       Pass     InBody BPBIO320 Equivalence Recommended E189
InBody BPBIO330 Osc       Pass     InBody BPBIO320 Equivalence Recommended E188
InBody BPBIO330N Osc       Pass     InBody BPBIO320 Equivalence Recommended E212
InBody BPBIO480KV Aus & Osc           Pass
(2020-01)
At rest Recommended 132
InBody BPBIO750 Osc       Pass     InBody BPBIO320 Equivalence Recommended E187
InBody HBP170 Osc         Pass   InBody BP170 Equivalence Recommended E211
InBody HBP570 Osc         Pass   InBody BPBIO250 Equivalence Recommended E210
JAMR F1701T Osc           Pass At rest Recommended 178
JOYTECH DBP-1333b Osc           Pass
(+1:2020)
At rest Recommended 194
JOYTECH DBP-6279B Osc           Pass At rest Recommended 131
KOROT P3 Accurate Aus & Osc           Pass InBody BPBIO480KV Equivalence Recommended E372
Lohmeier B-606 Osc     Pass       Abstract Questionable 4
Microlife BP 3AS1-2 Osc     Pass       At rest Recommended 34
  A/A         Pregnancy Recommended 68
  B/A         Pre-Eclampsia Recommended 68
Microlife WatchBP Home (BP3MX1-1) Osc     Pass       At rest Recommended 61
  A/A         Pregnancy Recommended 62
  B/A         Pre-Eclampsia Recommended 62
Microlife WatchBP Home A (BP3MX1-3) Osc     Pass       Watch BP Home Equivalence Recommended E27
Microlife WatchBP Home N (BP3MX1-4) Osc     Pass       Watch BP Home Equivalence Recommended E70
Microlife WatchBP Home S (BP3MX1-5) Osc     Pass       Watch BP Home Equivalence Recommended E28
Microlife WatchBP O3 (3MZ0) Osc     Pass       At rest Recommended 38
Microlife WatchBP O3 (3MZ1) Osc     Pass       At rest Recommended 39
Microlife WatchBP Office Osc     Pass       At rest Recommended 33
Microlife WatchBP Office ABI Osc Pass A/A Pass       At rest Recommended 42 FTS
    Pass       L-XL size cuff Recommended 45
Microlife WatchBP Office AFIB Electronic     Pass       WatchBP Office Equivalence Recommended E29
Microlife WatchBP Office Target Electronic     Pass       BP A100 Equivalence Recommended E37
Nissei DM-3000 Osc     Pass       Automatic Mode Recommended 37
Nissei DS-A10 Osc       Pass     DSK-1011 Equivalence Recommended E121
Nissei DS-B10 Osc       Pass     DSK-1011 Equivalence Recommended E122
Nissei DS-G10 Osc       Pass     DSK-1011 Equivalence Recommended E128
Nissei DS-N10 Osc       Pass     DSK-1031 Equivalence Recommended E129
Nissei DS-S10 Osc       Pass     DSK-1031 Equivalence Recommended E130
Nissei DSK-1011 Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 48
Nissei DSK-1031 Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 49
Nissei DSK-1051 Osc       Pass     DSK-1031 Equivalence Recommended E98
Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) Osc     Pass         Recommended 20
Osc Pass A/A         Minor recruitment modification Recommended 19
Osc     Pass       Children and adolescents. Reasonable adaptation of protocol. Recommended 3
Omron 725 CIC (HEM-725CIC) Osc             Ad Hoc Protocol. None 26
Omron 907 (HEM-907-E) Aus & Osc     Pass       Data analysed according to IP proposal only, Osc mode only Questionable 10
Pass           At rest, Osc mode only, AAMI only, Recruitment violation Questionable 11
    Pass       Elderly Population. Mode not stated. Recommended 27
    Fail       In ESRD before and after haemodialysis, Osc mode only Not Recommended 36
Omron HBP-1100 Osc       Pass     Omron HBP-1300 Equivalence Recommended E116
Omron HBP-1120 Osc Pass     Pass     Omron HBP-1320 Equivalence Recommended E186
Omron HBP-1300 Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 65
Omron HBP-1320 Osc         Pass   At rest Recommended 78
      Pass     At rest Recommended 79
Omron HBP-9030 Osc         Pass   Omron HBP-9031C Equivalence Recommended E217
Omron HBP-9031C Osc         Pass   General population; At rest Recommended 86
Omron HBP-T105 Osc     Pass       High speed mode with smart inflation Recommended 31
Omron HEM-7130 (Japanese model) Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 58
Omron HEM-7250-IT Osc       Pass     Omron HEM-7251G Equivalence Recommended E102
Omron HEM-7251G Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 53
Omron HEM-7252G-HP Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 67
Omron HEM-7320F Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 59
Omron HEM-7500F Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 60
Omron EVOLV
(HEM-7600T-E)
Osc       Pass*     Pregnancy
* Modified ESH-IP 2010
Recommended 74
Omron i-Q142
(HEM-1040-E)
Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 51
Omron M2
(HEM-7121-E)
Osc       Pass     Omron HEM-7130 (Japanese model) Equivalence Recommended E112
Omron M2 Basic
(HEM-7120-E)
Osc       Pass     Omron HEM-7130 (Japanese model) Equivalence Recommended E111
Omron M3
(HEM-7131-E)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) Equivalence Recommended E113
Omron M3
(HEM-7154-E)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) Equivalence Recommended E197
Omron M3 Comfort
(HEM-7134-E)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E140
      Pass*     Pregnancy
* Modified ESH-IP 2010
Recommended 75
Omron M3 Comfort
(HEM-7155-E)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E199
Omron M3 IT
(HEM-7131U-E)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) Equivalence Recommended E114
Omron M3W
(HEM-7202-E)
Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 50
Omron M4-I
(HEM-752-E)
Osc Pass A/A Pass       705IT (HEM-759-E) Equivalence Recommended E15
Omron M4 Intelli IT
(HEM-7155T-EBK)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E199
Omron M6 AC
(HEM-7322-E)
Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 64
Omron M6 Comfort
(HEM-7321-E)
Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 63
Omron M6 Comfort
(HEM-7360-E)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E201
Omron M6 Comfort IT
(HEM-7322U-E)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E115
Omron M7 Intelli IT
(HEM-7322T-E)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E154
Omron M7 Intelli IT
(HEM-7361T-EBK)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E202
Omron MIT Elite
(HEM-7300-WE)
Osc   A/A         Pregnancy Recommended 43
  A/A         Pre-Eclampsia Recommended 43
Omron (Colin) Pressmate BP10 Osc     Pass       At rest Recommended 31
Omron X3 Comfort
(HEM-7155-EO)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E203
Omron X4 Smart
(HEM-7155T-ESL)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E206
Omron X6 Comfort
(HEM-7360-EO)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E204
Omron X7 Smart
(HEM-7361T-ESL)
Osc       Pass     Omron M6 Comfort(HEM-7321-E) Equivalence Recommended E205
Pic Solution (Artsana)
Pic Indolor (Artsana)
CARDIOSimple
Osc       Pass     Andon KD-5917 Equivalence Recommended E146
Plusmed pM-NT 01 Osc     Pass       Microlife BP3AS1-2 Equivalence Recommended E125
Primo RACD Radial artery compression (Pass)           RAL catheter in ICU. Limited sample. Device "shows promise" (Authors). Questionable 32
SAFETY PRONTEX INTEGRA (NISSEI DS-B33-03) Osc       Pass     Nissei DSK-1011 Equivalence Recommended E167
SAFETY PRONTEX SYNTESI (NISSEI DS-B23-03) Osc       Pass     Nissei DSK-1011 Equivalence Recommended E166
Somnomedics Somnotouch-NIBP Wrist PTT       Pass     At rest Recommended 69
Spengler Tensionic Mod EPS 112 Osc Pass B/A         At rest; Abstract Questionable 2
SunTech Medical SunTech 247 Osc Pass; A/A Pass       At rest Recommended 35
Terumo ES-H55 Osc
Double-cuff
Pass           Manufacturer Assessment Questionable 15
Thermor Bios BD215 Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 54
UEBE Visomat Comfort E (Ref 24016) Osc       Pass     Double Comfort (Osc Mode) Equivalence Recommended E104
UEBE Visomat Comfort Eco (Ref 24026) Osc       Pass     Double Comfort (Osc Mode) Equivalence Recommended E135
UEBE Visomat Double Comfort Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 4147
Aus       Pass     At rest Recommended 4046
Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs Osc Pass           Only Method 1 completed. Ages 5-77 Questionable 28
YuWell YE660D Osc           Pass
(+1:2020
At rest Recommended 205
YuWell YE690A Osc       Pass     At rest Recommended 76

References for Validation of Automated Devices for Clinical Use

1 Anwar YA, Tendler BE, McCabe EJ, Mansoor GA, White WB. Evaluation of the Datascope Accutorr Plus according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation Blood Press Monit 1997;2(2):105-10
2 Bobrie G, Battaglia C. Assessment of Tensionic Mod EPS 112 semi-automatic device of blood pressure measurement (Manufactured by Spengler - France) J Hypertens 1999:17 (suppl 3):S22-S23. Abstract
3 Stergiou GS, Yiannes NG, Rarra VC. Validation of the Omron 705IT oscillometric device for home blood pressure measurement in children and adolescents: The Arsakion School Study Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006,11:229-234
4 Pujol E, Jimenez L, Estrada D, de la Sierra A. Accuracy of the automated oscillometric device Lohmeier B-606 for measurement of blood pressure in hospitals AJH 2002;15:74 A (Abstract)
5 Mattu GS, Perry TL, Wright JM. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100Beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer Blood Press Monit 2001;6:153-159
6 Wright JM, Mattu GS, Perry TL, Gelfer M, Strange KD, Zorn A, Chen Y. Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitor Blood Press Monit 2001;6:161-165
7 Jones CR, Taylor K, Poston L, Shennan AH. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' oscillometric blood pressure monitor J Hum Hypertens 2001;15:191-195
8 Braam RL, de Maat CHA, Thien TH. Accuracy of the Welch Allyn Vital Signs Monitor 52000 Blood Pressure Measuring Device J Hypertens 2001;19 (suppl 2):S24 (Abstract)
9 Prisant LM, Resnick LM, Hollenberg SM. Assessment of sequential same arm agreement of blood pressure measurements by a CVProfilor DO-2020TM versus a Baumanometer� mercury sphygmomanometer Blood Press Monit 2001;6:149-152
10 El Assaad MA, Topouchian JA, Darne BM, Asmar RG. Validation of the Omron HEM-907 device for blood pressure measurement Blood Press Monit 2002;7:237-241
11 White WB, Anwar YA. Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults Blood Press Monit 2001;6:107-110
12 Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Comparison of the automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTru) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population Blood Press Monit 2004;9:39-45
13 Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Overall accuracy of the BpTru - an automated electronic blood pressure device Blood Press Monit 2004;9:47-52
14 Graves JW, Nash C, Baily KR, Sheps SG. Utility of an automated blood pressure (BP) measuring device (BPTru) in clinical decision making. American Journal of Hypertension 2003;16(No 5, Part 2):49A (Abstract P-29)
15 Tochikubo O, Nishijima K, Ohshige K, Kimura K. Accuracy and applicability of the Terumo ES-H55 double-cuff sphygmomanometer for hospital use Blood Press Monit 2003;8:203-209
16 Salvi P, Lio G, Ricci E, Labat C, Benetos A. Validation of a new hand-held transcutaneous arterial tonometer for a non-invasive evaluation of blood pressure values, pulse wave morphology and central hemodynamic parameters J Hypertens 2004;22 (suppl 1):S130 (Abstract P465)
17 White W, Herbst T, Thavarajah S, Giacco S. Clinical evaluation of the Trimline blood pressure cuffs with the Accutorr Plus Monitor Blood Press Monit 2003;8:137-140
18 Kobalava ZD , Kotovskaya YV , Rodionov EV, Moiseev VS. Validation of the TM-2564G device for in-hospital blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure Monitoring 2005;10:333-335
19 Coleman A, Freeman P, Steel S, Shennan A. Validation of the Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006;11:27-32
20 El Assad M, Topouchian J, Asmar R. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT Blood Press Monit 2003;8(3):127-133
21 Reinders A, Reggiori F , Shennan AH. Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population Blood Press Monit 2006;11:293-296
22 Wong SN, Sung RYT, Leung LCK. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006;11:281-291
23 Pergola PE, White CL, Graves JW, Coffey CS, Tonarelli SB, Hart RG, Benavente OR for the SPS3 investigators. Reliability and validity of blood pressure measurement in the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:1-8
24 de Greeff A, Reggiori F, Shennan AH. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:51-55
25 Yarows SA. Accuracy of the HoMedics BPA-300, a home blood pressure monitor using the auscultatory method Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:339-343
26 Fonseca-Reyes S, Cervantes-Munguia R, de Alba-Garcia JG, Parra-Carrillo JZ, Lopez-Maldonado F, Montes-Casillas M. Evaluation and effects of the Omron 725 CIC device for measuring blood pressure in a hypertension clinic Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:321-327
27 Omboni S, Riva I, Giglio I, Caldara G, Groppelli A, Parati G. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:233-242
28 Alpert BS. Validation of the Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs blood pressure device according to the ANSI/AAMI SP10: 2002. Accuracy and cost-efficiency successfully combined Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:345-347
29 Topouchian J, El Feghali R, El Assaad H, Pannier B, Asmar R. Validation of the G-Care Electronics SP-8000 (op. cit. SP-800 ) Device for Blood Pressure Measurement According to the International Validation Protocol Journal of Hypertension 2006;25(suppl 2):S172 (Abstract)
30 de Greeff A, Arora J, Hervey S, Liu B, Shennan AH. Accuracy assessment of the Tensoval duo control according to the British and European Hypertension Societies' standards Blood Pressure Monitoring 2008;13:111-116
31 Asmar R, Khabouth J, Mattar J, Pecchioli V, Germano G. Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional. J Hypertens 2010;28(3):452-458
32 Fix ML, Goldstein JN, Listwa TM, Nelson SW, Thomas SH. Comparison of a radial artery compression device with invasive radial artery blood pressure monitoring Blood Press Monit 2008;13:199-203
33 Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, Nasothimiou E, Kapralos C. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol Blood Press Monit 2008;13:299-303
34 de Greeff A, Nathan H, Stafford N, Liu B, Shennan AH. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. Blood Press Monit 2008;13:342-348
35 Friz HP, Facchetti R, Primitz L, Beltrame L, Galbiati V, Ricioppo A, Bombelli M, Sega R. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards. Blood Press Monit 2009;14:222-227
36 Czarkowski M, Staszk�w M, Kostyra K, Shebani Z, Niemczyk S, Matuszkiewicz-Rowi?ska J. Determining the accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Omron HEM-907 before and after hemodialysis. Blood Press Monit 2009;14:232-238
37 Tasker F, De Greeff A, Shennan AH. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24:609-616
38 Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Nasothimiou EG, Karpettas N, Protogerou A. Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24(3):207-12.
39 Ragazzo F, Saladini F, Palatini P. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP O3 device for clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement, according to the International Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2010;15(1):59-62.
40 Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in auscultation mode, for clinic use and self-measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(4):208-210.
41 Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinic use and self-measurement in a general population according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol, revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(5):262-264
42 Saladini F, Benetti E, Masiero S, Palatini P. Accuracy of Microlife WatchBP Office ABI monitor assessed according to the 2002 European Society of Hypertension protocol and the British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(5):258-261
43 Chung Y, Brochut MC, de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Clinical accuracy of inflationary oscillometry in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: Omron-MIT Elite. Preg Hyper: An Int J Women's Card Health 2012 (In press) doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2012.04.001
44 Chen C, Shang F, Wang J, Chen J, Ji N, Wan Y. Validation of the iHealth BP3 upper-arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2012;17(6):253-256. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32835b9ecb
45 Masiero S, Saladini F, Benetti E, Palatini P. Accuracy of the Microlife large-extra large-sized cuff (32-52 cm) coupled to an automatic oscillometric device. Blood Press Monit. 2011;16(2):99-102. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328344c73c
46 Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in auscultation mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Apr 27. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of UEBE Visomat_Double_Comfort (Auscultatory Mode).pdf.
47 Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Apr 27. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of UEBE Visomat_Double_Comfort (Oscillometric Mode).pdf.
48 de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Nissei DSK-1011 upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Sep 01. 9 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Nissei DSK-1011.pdf.
49 de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Nissei DSK-1031 upper arm oscillometric blood pressure monitor intended for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Oct 28. 3 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Nissei DSK-1031.pdf.
50 Takahashi H. Validation of the Omron M3W upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Mar 01. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron M3W (HEM-7202-E).pdf
51 Takahashi H. Validation of the Omron i-Q142(HEM-1040-E), an upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Jun 07. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron i-Q142 (HEM-1040-E).pdf
52 Ding D. Validation of the FORA P30 Plus Upper Arm Blood Pressure Monitor, for Clinic Use and Self/Home Measurement, According to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Oct 19. 6 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Foracare Fora P30 Plus.pdf
53 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7251G upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Feb 01. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7251G.pdf
54 Palatini P. Validation of the Thermor Bios BP215 upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Oct 09. 11 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Thermor Bios BD215.pdf
55 de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Tensoval Duo Control II blood pressure monitor for clinic use and self-measurement according to the British Hypertension Society protocol and the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(3):161-6. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328360fb52
56 Zeng WF, Liu M, Kang YY, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the fully automated A&D TM-2656 blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(4):223-6. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283624abd
57 Gothardo AC, Savioli AF, Santos DS, Lamas JL. Lack of validation of the Dixtal (DX 2020) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinical use in an intensive care unit, according to the European Society of Hypertension-International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(4):215-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283624ad7
58 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7130 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7130.pdf
59 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7320F upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7500F.pdf
60 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7500F upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7500F.pdf
61 Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Charilaos P. Gkinos CP, Patouras JD. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol Blood Press Monit 2007;12:185-188
62 Chung Y, de Greeff A, Shennan A. Validation and Compliance of a Home Monitoring Device in Pregnancy: Microlife WatchBP Home. Hypertens Pregnancy 2009;28(3):348-59.
63 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 Jan 22. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E).pdf
64 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 Jan 22. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E).pdf
65 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HBP-1300 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 May 22. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HBP-1300.pdf
66 Guo WG1, Li BL, He Y, Xue YS, Wang HY, Zheng QS, Xiang DC. Validation of the Andon KD-5917 automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. Blood Press Monit 2014;19(4):242-5. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000048
67 Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the Omron HEM-7252G-HP upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2015 Jan 16. 4 p. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HEM-7252G-HP.pdf
68 Hannah L. Nathan, Annemarie de Greeff, Natasha L. Hezelgrave, Lucy C. Chappell and Andrew H. Shennan. Validation of the Microlife 3AS1-2 semi-automated blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society. Blood Pressure Monitoring 2015;20:52-55
69 Bilo G., Zorzi C., Ochoa Munera J.E., Torasco C., Giuli V. and Parati G. Validation of the Somnotouch-NIBP non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Pressure Monitoring 2015 Oct; 20(5):291-94 doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000124
70 Kobalava ZD, Kotovskaya YV, Babaeva LA, Moiseev VS. Validation of the TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement Blood Press Monit 2006;11:87-90 doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000200484.49540.12.
71 Beimea B., Deutscha C., Kr�gera R., Zimmermannb E. and Bramlagea P. Validation of the blood pressure measurement device Erkameter 125 PRO according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2016 Dec;21(6):356-360. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000216
72 Wua N, Zhangb X, Wangb W and Zhangb H. Validation of the Andon KD5031 for clinical use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2016 Oct; 21(5):310-312(3). doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000204
73 Wua N, Zhangb X, Wangb W and Zhangb H. Validation of the Andon KD595 for clinical use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2016 Apr;21(2):124-7. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000164
74 TOPOUCHIAN J., ZELVEIAN P. and ASMAR R. Validation of the automatic blood pressure measurements device, the OMRON EVOLV (HEM- 7600 T-E)® in Pregnancy according to the Modified European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP). [Internet]. Dublin: dabl Educational Trust; 2018 Jan 08. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of OMRON EVOLV (HEM-7600 T-E) v2.pdf
75 TOPOUCHIAN J., ZELVEIAN P. and ASMAR R. Validation of the automatic blood pressure measurements device, the OMRON M3 COMFORT (HEM -7134-E)® in Pregnancy according to the Modified European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP). [Internet]. Dublin: dabl Educational Trust; 2018 Jan 08. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of OMRON M3 COMFORT (HEM-7134-E) v2.pdf
76 Chen Q., Lei L., Li Y. and Wang JG. Validation of the YuWell YE690A upper-arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2017 Oct;22(5):295-297. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000278
77 Kollias A., Stambolliu E., Kyriakoulis KG., Papadatos SS., Stergiou GS. Validation of the single-cuff oscillometric blood pressure monitor InBody BPBIO320 for public use according to the 2010 European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. 2018 Dec 7; doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000359
78 Takahashil H., Nishiyauchi K.,Yoshikawa N. and Hishiki Y. A clinical evaluation report of the performance of the OMRON digital blood pressure monitor, HBP-1320, on accuracy as compared to the value measured by auscultation with a mercury sphygmomanometer. Available from: OMRON HBP-1320 Validation - AAMI ISO 81060-2.2013.pdf
79 Takahashi H. Validation of the OMRON HBP-1320 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Available from: ESH-IP 2010 Validation of Omron HBP-1320.pdf
80 Fania C., Albertini F. and Palatini P. Validation of the A&D UM-201 device for office blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2017 Aug;22(4):234-237. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000257
81 Fania C., Albertini F. and Palatini P. Validation of the A&D UM-211 device for office blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2017 Oct;22(5):302-305. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000266
82 Zhang W, L L, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the HL868ED upper-arm blood pressure monitor for clinical use and self-measurement according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2019 Aug;24(4):203-207. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000384
83 Zhang W., Lei L., Li Y., Wang JG. Validation of the HL868ED upper-arm blood pressure monitor for clinical use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2019 Oct 25. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000411
84 Kollias, Anastasios; Gravvani, Areti; Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis; Kyriakoulis, Konstantinos G.; Bountzona, Ioanna; Menti, Ariadni; Stergiou, George S. Validation of the InBody BPBIO250 oscillometric blood pressure monitor for professional office use in general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard. Blood Pressure Monitoring: April 2020 - Volume 25 - Issue 2 - p 115-117. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000428
85 Kollias, Anastasios; Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis; Gravvani, Areti; Stambolliu, Emelina; Bountzona, Ioanna; Menti, Ariadni; Stergiou, George S. Validation of the InBody BP170 oscillometric home blood pressure monitor in general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard Blood Pressure Monitoring: February 2020 - Volume 25 - Issue 1 - p 50-52. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000410
86 Kanako Saito, Yukiko Hishiki, Hakuo Takahashi. Validation of the Omron HBP-9031C professional office blood pressure monitor in the general population according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocol. Journal of human hypertension: 2020 Jan 22. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1038/s41371-020-0301-0
87 Validation of the Hingmed DBP-01P clinical automatic blood pressure monitor provided with wide-range cuff, evaluated in a general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 Protocol Claudio Fania, Antonella Giletto, Valentina Zanello and Paolo Palatini. Blood Pressure Monitoring 28(2):p 116-120, April 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000638
131 Validation of the JOYTECH DBP-6279B blood pressure monitor in adults and adolescents according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard(ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020) Baojing Duana, Le Heb, Jianling Zhangc, Lixiu Fangd and Gang Lia. Blood Pressure Monitoring ():10.1097/MBP.0000000000000662, July 12, 2023. | DOI: DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000662
132 Validation of the InBody BPBIO480KV validation according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard. Angeliki Ntineri, Aikaterini Theodosiadi, Ariadni Menti, Konstantinos G. Kyriakoulis, Vasileios Ntousopoulos, Anastasios Kollias, and George S. Stergiou Journal of Hypertension 41(2):p 356-361, February 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003341
178 Validation of the JAMR F1701T (arm type) pressure monitor according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/ISO 81060-2:2018 protocol. Li, Jing; Han, Li-Hong; Feng, Ru; Wu, Li-Hao; Cai, Jie; Zeng, Tian-Ying; Liu, Hui; Zeng, Ya-Wen; Zhou, Li; Zhan, Zhong-Qun Blood Pressure Monitoring 28(3):p 163-166, June 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000643
194 Validation of the DBP-1333b upper-arm blood pressure monitor according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard (ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd.1:2020) Guocun Hou, Yulu Wu, Jiaying Wang and Jia Zhi Blood Pressure Monitoring 2024 Jan 9. | DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000688.
205 Validation of the YuWell YE660D oscillometric upper-arm blood pressure monitor for clinic and home in general population according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard (ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd.1:2020) Hui-Jie Zhang, Yue Peng, Juan Zhang, Jin Zhang, Li-Ni Teng, Shu-Juan Zhang, De-Jun Zhou and Ming-Zhi Long. | Blood Pressure Monitoring 2023, 28:276–279. DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000658.

Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement of Blood Pressure

For a complete list of devices see our Device Index and for discontinued devices see our Discontinued Devices Index.

   
Device Mode AAMI BHS ESH 2002 ESH 2010 ISO 81060-2:2013 ISO 81060-2:2018 Circumstance Recommendation Ref
TNO BIO
Finometer
Finger Fail C/D         Pregnancy;
Semi-supine;
Protocol adjustments
Not Recommended 1
Fail C/B         Normotensive Subgroup
Fail D/D         Pre-eclampsia Subgroup
Fail D/D         Hypertensive Subgroup
Pass A/B         Abstract; Black Women; Protocol violations; Incorrect sample size Questionable 2

References for Validation of Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement of Blood Pressure

1 Elvan-Taspinar A, UiterKamp LAMS, Sikkema JM, Bots ML, Koomans HA, Bruinse HW, Franx A. Validation and use of the Finometer for blood pressure measurement in normal, hypertensive and pre-eclamptic pregnancy J Hypertension 2003;21:S2053-2060
2 Schutte AE, Huisman HW, van Rooyen JM, Malan NT, Schutte R. Validation of the Finometer device for measurement of blood pressure in black women. J Human Hypertens 2004;18(2):79-84 Abstract

 

© Copyright dabl®Educational Trust Ltd. 2002-2024. All rights reserved. Please read the Disclaimer before using this website.

« Back  |  Top  |  Sitemap  |  Next »